How would the Classical Labyrinths look as Babylonian Visceral Labyrinths?

Or differently asked: Can I transform a classical labyrinth into a Babylonian visceral labyrinth?

Therefore we should first see the differences; and then the interlinking components.

As an example I start with the best known classical labyrinth: The 7 circuit Cretan labyrinth.

The 7 circuit labyrinth

The 7 circuit Classical labyrinth, on the right the complementary to it

It has a center and an entrance. There is only one way in. In the middle I am at the aim and at the end of the way. To leave I must turn and take the same way in reverse order.

Among the Babylonian visceral labyrinths one can distinguish two main groups. One are more round and devoured into each other, while in others the loops are arranged row-shaped.

Here as an example the labyrinth E3384_r8 on a clay tablet from Tell Barri (Syria) (for more, please see related posts below).

A Babylonisn visceral labyrinth

A Babylonian visceral labyrinth with 10 circuits and two entries

In the visceral labyrinth I have two entries and no real center. Nevertheless, the way leads through all of the loops to the other access. It is a walk-through labyrinth.

The circuits here are numbered from the left to the right, while in the classical labyrinths they are numbered from the outside inwards. “0” stands for the outside, in the classical labyrinth the last figure for the center.

Every labyrinth is designated by a row of numbers, the circuit sequence or the path sequence. This is the order in which the circuits will be run one by one.

The connecting element therefore is the circuit sequence. Hence, we must construct “row-shaped” walk-through labyrinths from the circuit sequence of the classical labyrinths.

At first we take the 7 circuit labyrinth as shown above. We use the circuit sequence and connect the circuits arranged in row accordingly. The second “0” indicates the walk-through labyrinth.
Then this looks as follows:

Das 7-gängige Labyrinth als Eingeweidelabyrinth

The 7 circuit classical labyrinth as visceral labyrinth, on the right the complementary

We make this still for some more classical labyrinths.

Das 3-gängige Labyrinth

The 3 crcuit labyrinth, on the left the original, on the right the complementary to it

The original is developed from the meander and is also called Knossos labyrinth. The right one is developed from the “emaciated” seed pattern. However, is at the same time complementary to the Knossos labyrinth. Under the walk-in labyrinths the visceral walk-through labyrinths.


A 5 circuit labyrinth:

Das 5-gängige Labyrinth

A 5 circuit labyrinth, on the right the complementary

There are still other 5 circuit labyrinths with an other circuit sequence. But, in principle, the process is the same one.

The shown examples were all self-dual labyrinths.


Now we take a 9 circuit labyrinth. There are more variations:

Das 9-gängige Labyrinth

A 9 circuit labyrinth in four variations

And here the corresponding visceral labyrinths:

Die Eingeweidelabyrinthe

The visceral labyrinths


Here the 11 circuit labyrinth with the corresponding visceral labyrinths:

Das 11-gängige Labyrinth

The 11 circuit labyrinth and its complementary

This one is self-dual again. Therefore there is only one complementary version to it.


Here the 15 circuit labyrinth:

Das 15-gängige Labyrinth

The 15 circuit labyrinth and its complementary

This is also self-dual.

If we compare these newly derived visceral labyrinths to the up to now known historical Babylonian visceral labyrinths, we can ascertain no correspondence. Maybe a clay tablet with an identical labyrinth appears somewhere and sometime?

So far we know about 21 Babylonian visceral labyrinths as row-shaped examples in most different variations.

For comparison I recommend the following article with the overview.

Related Posts

From Meander to Labyrinth

Hermann Kern is writing in his book Through the Labyrinth (Prestel Verlag, Munich) on page 23 about the principles of form:

Every labyrinth consists of lines that may be construed as a sort of ground plan; they form a sophisticated pattern of movement that requires considerable powers of the imagination to grasp. By trying to envisage walking the path between the lines, one can begin to comprehend this pattern.

Quoting this, I don’t want to deter someone, but make clearly that the employment with the labyrinth can be absolutely demanding. And I would like to assist for a better understanding.

From all one can “generate” a labyrinth, more exactly said: the way in a labyrinth. Since the meander is Ariadne’s thread (just the way) in linear form.
On looking more carefully one recognises some small differences. They are formed by mirroring the “basic form” either in horizontal or vertical axis. One can distinguish four different variations. In the following drawing this can be understood with the help of the colours and figures:

I can “read” the meander from left to right or from right to left. Accordingly to that is the situation of the entrance.


How do I make a labyrinth out of the meander? Or said a little more sophisticated: What code is hidden in the meander that leads me to the labyrinth?

I try to make the “deciphering” as easily comprehensible as possible. Therefore the colours and the figures shall serve as help. So one can pursue the way of the single segments.

Rotated meander

Rotated meander

First I turn the meander with the access below left from the above drawing about 90 degrees to the left.
The “secret” in the meander is the arrangement of the lines. They are numbered from “0” to “8”. “0” stands for outside, beginning of the line, init. “8” stands for inside, end of the line, middle, center, goal, target, aim. These line segments are also marked with different colours.
Now I read the order in which these segments will be passed through. And, true readers of this blog know it, this will give me the path sequence (line sequence, circuit sequence, level sequenc) for the labyrinth. It is: 0-3-2-1-4-7-6-5-8.
I can also derive the changes of direction from it. So whether it goes to the left or to the right, outwardly or inwards.

I pull apart this rotated meander crosswise. The labyrinth will be presented as a diagram. Of course the lengths of the single line segments are distorted, do not correspond to the original ones or the new lengths. But it does not depend on it at all. It is only important in which direction a line is running. For it is a pattern. Maybe it is difficultly to understand, above all the situation of the entrance and the center. In the real labyrinth they are situated near together and not as in the pattern on the right or left side outside.

The diagram

The diagram

I imagine this rectangle always as a pulled apart ring or tyre. If I cut the back side of this ring in the middle and lay both outer ends side by side, the entrance will be situated on the left side and the center on the right one.
Maybe one can recognize that better in the lower drawing? If I pursue the numbered lines (3-2-1-4-7-6-5-8) I alternately have to leave one side and enter on the other side again. The best bet is to try out.

The split diagram

The split diagram

Because I can deduce the right path sequence for the labyrinth (Ariadne’s thread) from the meander, I can draw the labyrinth by only using this path sequence. I do not need the well-known seed pattern to draw the labyrinth (the walls).
The labyrinth matching to the meander and the diagram looks as follows:

The left-hand classical labyrinth (Ariadne's thread)

The left-hand classical labyrinth (Ariadne’s thread)

Here in square shape:

The square classical labyrinth

The square classical labyrinth

Which meander generates now this left-hand labyrinth? From the above shown four versions the one with the access below left and the other with the access above right. Why? Because the circuit 3 (yellow) turns to the left after passing through 0 (grey).

However, in the meander versions with the access below right and the access above left circuit 3 turns to the right first. Consequently the labyrinth generated from them must also look different, namely as follows:

The right-hand classical labyrinth (Ariadne's thread)

The right-hand classical labyrinth (Ariadne’s thread)

However, this is nothing else than the vertically mirrored left-hand labyrinth.
Two versions of the classical 7 circuit labyrinth can be derived from the four possible versions of a meander, suitable for a labyrinth.


However, in the end the labyrinth should be also shown in such a way as it many know: With the representation of the boundary lines (the walls). They are held in black. The way, Ariadne’s thread coloured in the drawings before, is the free space between the lines. The boundary lines cross and have a beginning, here even four. This form can be easier generated from the seed pattern.

The left-hand classical labyrinth (walls)

The left-hand classical labyrinth (walls)

If one makes the ways in all circuits of the same width, the usually central cross will change to the the diamond-shaped “fontanel”.

Related Posts

The Stone Labyrinth of Contemplation at Hofkirchen i.M. (Austria)

On Saturday 4th of August, 2012 at the the labyrinth congress in Hofkirchen i. M., the morning was dedicated to the labyrinth of transformation. We had first a short introduction to the origination process of this impressive labyrinth made of granite from the Mühlviertel (Austrian district, where Hofkirchen is situated). After that we explored the labyrinth ourselves, combined with a small ritual.

The layout of the stone labyrinth

The layout of the stone labyrinth

Here some information from a very good made tablet beside the labyrinth:

Description

Description

Here some pictures from the labyrinth walk:


Please try also to use the carousel for looking the pictures in full screen mode. Click inside any picture. Then you can scroll forwards and backwards. To return to this post click into the black surface or press the “Esc” key on your keyboard.

Who wants to visit the labyrinth, has several possibilities:

  • Look for information on the website Labyrinthe Hofkirchen
  • Ask anyone on site, because everybody in Hofkirchen knows the way
  • Orientate and navigate on one’s own. Hikers and bikers will reach it directly, drivers must get out before. Here the geographical position of the stone labyrinth: 48 28 38.9 N, 13 50 0.6 E

Or take a look on Google Earth? The labyrinth is not to be seen as yet. But maybe in some years when the satellite images are replaced?
The labyrinth is approximately in the middle of the image, on a clearing in the right upper corner.

Related Posts

How to Find / Draw a New Labyrinth

To draw the labyrinth from the basic pattern, still fascinates everybody which does it the first time. There is the basic pattern for the boundary lines (the walls) and since 2010 also the basic pattern for the path, Ariadne’s thread.

However, this is not the only possibility. On exploring the meander I have generated labyrinths from different meander combinations, and have found well-known and new types unknown still up to now.
I have seen the meander as a source for the path sequence in the labyrinth. Since a labyrinth is defined above all by its path sequence, even tough not only.

When drawing freehand Ariadne’s thread I have discovered that there are sometimes several possibilities to change the direction of a circuit.

This inspired me to look for other variations for the well-known classical 7 circuit labyrinth with the meanwhile equally well-known path sequence 0-3-2-1-4-7-6-5-8.
And I have found three other labyrinth shapes with the same path sequence.

I have determined the basic pattern contained in it and the angular thread of Ariadne in form of the meander not until the labyrinth construction.

Here at first the familiar classical labyrinth in “pure form”:

The classical 7 circuit labyrinth

The classical 7 circuit labyrinth

The basic pattern for the walls is emphasized in color. Ariadne’s thread in diagram form shows that the path in the labyrinth is composed of two simple meanders (named type 4 by me).
The labyrinth has 7 circuits, four turning points and the path sequence 0-3-2-1-4-7-6-5-8.


In this variation the fourth circuit crosses the main axis and from the same path sequence as in the preceding labyrinth appears a new type:

A 7 circuit classical labyrinth with the 4th circuit crossing the axis

A 7 circuit classical labyrinth with the 4th circuit crossing the axis

The basic pattern is pulled apart and split. Ariadne’s thread is equally pulled apart, but both meander elements are clearly recognizable.
The labyrinth has 7 circuits, four turning points and the path sequence 0-3-2-1-4-7-6-5-8, however, quite an other shape.


Here the 7th circuit crosses the main axis and from the same path sequence a new type is generated:

A 7 circuit classical labyrinth with the 7th circuit crossing the axis

A 7 circuit classical labyrinth with the 7th circuit crossing the axis

The basic pattern is shifted again and split. Ariadne’s thread is changed, recognizable, however, the second element is mirrored.
The labyrinth has 7 circuits, four turning points and the path sequence 0-3-2-1-4-7-6-5-8, however, again quite an other appearance.


Now the 4th and 7th circuit crosses the main axis and from the same path sequence again a new type is produced:

A 7 circuit classical labyrinth with the 4th and the 7th circuit crossing the axis

A 7 circuit classical labyrinth with the 4th and the 7th circuit crossing the axis

The basic pattern is shifted and split. Ariadne’ s thread is changed, however, the two meander elements are recognizable.
The labyrinth has 7 circuits, four turning points and the path sequence 0-3-2-1-4-7-6-5-8, however, again quite an other appearance.

There are for the same path sequence four different shapes. It’s difficulty to name them correctly (and in short terms). Here one sees clearly that the information of the path sequence is not sufficient for the definition of a type.

Now one could ask, why there existed up to now no labyrinths of these types. From the modified basic pattern they are not easily to build, from the meander probably also not.

Considered closely, these three new variations doesn’t look especially nice. The components of square and circle do not make an appearance. The original, oldest and well-known version of the classical labyrinth is well-balanced and harmonious. There’s nothing like the good, old Cretan labyrinth. This shows up once more.

Related Posts