I was particularly fascinated by the technique of double barriers in Gossembrot’s 7 circuit labyrinths presented in recent posts. This makes possible completely new types of labyrinths. He probably did not “invent” the double barriers, but he was the first to consistently and systematically use them.
How does this technique affect 5 circuit labyrinths?
I tried that and came across a whole new kind of sector labyrinths.
As you know, one sector after another is traversed in these before the center is reached.
The historical Roman labyrinths are divided into three different variants: the meander type, the spiral type and the serpentine type (see the Related Posts below).
The entry into the labyrinth is usually up to the innermost lane. And in all four sectors the structures are the same.
The change to the next sector either always takes place outside or even once inside (or alternately).
Now the new type:
What is so special about that?
Already the entrance: It takes place on the 3rd lane. This does not occur in any historical sector labyrinth. And the entrance into the center is also from the 3rd lane.
Then the structure expressed by the path sequence is different in each quadrant.
Quadrant I: 3-2-1-4-5
Quadrant II: 5-2-3-4-1
Quadrant III: 1-4-3-2-5
Quadrant IV: 5-4-1-2-3
The transitions to the next sector are always alternately.
Nevertheless, the new labyrinth is very balanced and mirror-symmetrical.
Here in a square shape:
This makes it easier to compare with the previously known Roman labyrinths (see below), which are mostly square.
The difference to these becomes clear especially in the presentation as a diagram. Because this shows the inner structure, the pattern.
Very nice to see are the nested meanders.
But even in Knidos style, this type is doing well:
How should one call this type? And who builds one as a walkable labyrinth?